Diamond v. Harumado Realty Corp.
249 A.D. 744, 292 N.Y.S. 983, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5829
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1936·Published
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diamond v. Harumado Realty Corp., 249 A.D. 744, 292 N.Y.S. 983, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
249 A.D. 744 (Diamond v. Harumado Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.