Diamond v. De Lemos

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Diamond v. De Lemos

614 So. 2d 3, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1623, 1993 WL 31572

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 9, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1278

StatusPublished

This text of 614 So. 2d 3 (Diamond v. De Lemos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diamond v. De Lemos, 614 So. 2d 3, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1623, 1993 WL 31572 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the final judgment of dissolution of marriage of Sheila De Lemos and Richard De Lemos, one of the couple’s joint assets ordered distributed to the husband was the couple’s interest in nine real estate limited partnerships less $58,000 due in child support and alimony arrearages.

[4]*4We find no merit in the claim of the husband’s judgment creditors, who, acting as intervenors, argued that such an award determined a priority of creditors conflicting with sections 55.10, 695.11, and 56.061, Florida Statutes (1991). In compliance with section 61.075, Florida Statutes (1991), the trial judge considered and distributed the parties’ assets, and the intervenors cannot complain because the court chose to award to the husband only that portion of partnership collectibles over and above the arrearage amount.

Accordingly, the judgment under review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the final judgment of dissolution of marriage of Sheila De Lemos and Richard De Lemos, one of the couple’s joint assets ordered distributed to the husband was the couple’s interest in nine real estate limited partnerships less $58,000 due in child support and alimony arrearages.

[4]*4We find no merit in the claim of the husband’s judgment creditors, who, acting as intervenors, argued that such an award determined a priority of creditors conflicting with sections 55.10, 695.11, and 56.061, Florida Statutes (1991). In compliance with section 61.075, Florida Statutes (1991), the trial judge considered and distributed the parties’ assets, and the intervenors cannot complain because the court chose to award to the husband only that portion of partnership collectibles over and above the arrearage amount.

Accordingly, the judgment under review is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

614 So. 2d 3, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1623, 1993 WL 31572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-v-de-lemos-fladistctapp-1993.