Diamond v. Bach

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Diamond v. Bach

160 A. 334, 10 N.J. Misc. 776, 1932 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 135

DecidedMay 16, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A. 334 (Diamond v. Bach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diamond v. Bach, 160 A. 334, 10 N.J. Misc. 776, 1932 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 135 (N.J. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application is made for a writ of certiorari to review a judgment entered in the District Court of the Tirst Judicial District of Hudson County, which judgment was subsequently docketed in the Hudson County Circuit Court.

A writ of certiorari was granted applicant on September 1st, 19.22, which was in 1926 dismissed for lack of prosecution.

[777]*777In view of the circumstances of the case, as presented to us, we are constrained to deny the application for a writ of certiorari.

The application is denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Application is made for a writ of certiorari to review a judgment entered in the District Court of the Tirst Judicial District of Hudson County, which judgment was subsequently docketed in the Hudson County Circuit Court.

A writ of certiorari was granted applicant on September 1st, 19.22, which was in 1926 dismissed for lack of prosecution.

[777]*777In view of the circumstances of the case, as presented to us, we are constrained to deny the application for a writ of certiorari.

The application is denied, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A. 334, 10 N.J. Misc. 776, 1932 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-v-bach-nj-1932.