Diamond Tank Transport, Inc. v. United States
305 U.S. 567, 59 S. Ct. 149, 83 L. Ed. 357, 1938 U.S. LEXIS 543
Opinion
The [568]*568decree is affirmed. Hooker v. Knapp, 225 U. S. 302; Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 283 U. S. 235, 238; Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. United States ex rel. Campbell, 289 U. S. 385, 388; United States v. Griffin, 303 U. S. 226, 233, 234.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diamond Tank Transport, Inc. v. United States, 305 U.S. 567, 59 S. Ct. 149, 83 L. Ed. 357, 1938 U.S. LEXIS 543 (1938).
305 U.S. 567 (Diamond Tank Transport, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farley Terminal Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
522 F.2d 1095 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Farley Terminal Company, Inc. v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Harold Willinger, Doing Business as Assembly Consolidators, Plaintiff v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
522 F.2d 1095 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Ackman v. Northern States Contracting Co.
110 F.2d 774 (Sixth Circuit, 1940)