Diamond T. Utah, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

498 P.2d 355, 28 Utah 2d 68, 1972 Utah LEXIS 795
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedJune 22, 1972
DocketNo. 12628
StatusPublished

This text of 498 P.2d 355 (Diamond T. Utah, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diamond T. Utah, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 498 P.2d 355, 28 Utah 2d 68, 1972 Utah LEXIS 795 (Utah 1972).

Opinion

HENRIOD, Justice:

Appeal from a judgment sequeling a remand from this court in the same titled case, 21 Utah 2d 124, 441 P.2d 705 (1968), where this court concluded that the trial court erred in granting a summary judgment, since there was a genuine issue of fact as to whether a truck was stolen or no. Affirmed, with no costs.

Reference is made to the previous case for the facts and points involved. On the remand hearing, the record reveals that [69]*69there were no facts sufficient to establish that the vehicle was stolen, and the trial court so found, with which conclusion we agree. Our only alternative, therefore, is to affirm.

CALLISTER, C. J., and TUCKETT, ELLETT and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Diamond T Utah, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
441 P.2d 705 (Utah Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
498 P.2d 355, 28 Utah 2d 68, 1972 Utah LEXIS 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-t-utah-inc-v-travelers-indemnity-co-utah-1972.