Diamond T. Utah, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

498 P.2d 355, 28 Utah 2d 68, 1972 Utah LEXIS 795
Utah Supreme Court·Decided June 22, 1972·No. No. 12628·Published

Opinion

HENRIOD, Justice:

Appeal from a judgment sequeling a remand from this court in the same titled case, 21 Utah 2d 124, 441 P.2d 705 (1968), where this court concluded that the trial court erred in granting a summary judgment, since there was a genuine issue of fact as to whether a truck was stolen or no. Affirmed, with no costs.

Reference is made to the previous case for the facts and points involved. On the remand hearing, the record reveals that [69]*69there were no facts sufficient to establish that the vehicle was stolen, and the trial court so found, with which conclusion we agree. Our only alternative, therefore, is to affirm.

CALLISTER, C. J., and TUCKETT, ELLETT and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diamond T. Utah, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 498 P.2d 355, 28 Utah 2d 68, 1972 Utah LEXIS 795 (Utah 1972).

498 P.2d 355 (Diamond T. Utah, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diamond T Utah, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
441 P.2d 705 (Utah Supreme Court, 1968)