Diamond Stone Sawing Mach. Co. v. Brown

Second Circuit

Diamond Stone Sawing Mach. Co. v. Brown

137 F. 910, 70 C.C.A. 248, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4223

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 19, 1905·No. No. 132·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judge of the Circuit Court had an unusual opportunity for the thorough understanding of the questions involved in this controversy, for they were fully argued before him upon two occasions and on records substantially similar. We agree with him in the conclusions reached and his careful and exhaustive treatment of the issues involved makes further discussion unprofitable and unnecessary.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judge of the Circuit Court had an unusual opportunity for the thorough understanding of the questions involved in this controversy, for they were fully argued before him upon two occasions and on records substantially similar. We agree with him in the conclusions reached and his careful and exhaustive treatment of the issues involved makes further discussion unprofitable and unnecessary.

The decree is affirmed.

Diamond Stone Sawing Mach. Co. v. Brown, 137 F. 910, 70 C.C.A. 248, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4223 (2d Cir. 1905).

Pincite

137 F. 910 (Diamond Stone Sawing Mach. Co. v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.