Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United States

2019 CIT 54
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 301 F. Supp. 3d 1326
United States Court of International Trade·Decided May 7, 2019·No. Consol. 16-00124·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 19-54

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS’ COALTION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

BOSUN TOOLS, CO., LTD., et al.

Consolidated Plaintiffs,

CHENGDU HIUFENG DIAMOND TOOLS CO., LTD., et al. Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge Consolidated Plaintiffs,

v.

Consol. Court No. 16-00124 UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

WEIHAI XIANGGUANG MECHANICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., et al.,

Defendant-Intervenors.

JUDGMENT

The United States Department of Commerce has selected one of the methodologies suggested by the Court in its opinion ordering remand. No party alleges that the Court’s directions were not followed nor are there any objections to the new calculation adjustments made. Therefore, this case having been duly submitted for decision; and the court, after due deliberation, having rendered a decision herein; now, in conformity with said decision it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Final Results of Second Remand Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Ct. No. 16-00124, Doc. No. 96, by the United

States Department of Commerce are SUSTAINED.

__/s/Jane A. Restani_____ Jane A. Restani, Judge

Dated: May 7, 2019 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United States, 2019 CIT 54 (cit 2019).

2019 CIT 54 (Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.