Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United States
This text of 2019 CIT 54 (Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Slip Op. 19-54
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS’ COALTION, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
BOSUN TOOLS, CO., LTD., et al.
Consolidated Plaintiffs,
CHENGDU HIUFENG DIAMOND TOOLS CO., LTD., et al. Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge Consolidated Plaintiffs, v. Consol. Court No. 16-00124 UNITED STATES,
Defendant,
WEIHAI XIANGGUANG MECHANICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., et al.,
Defendant-Intervenors.
JUDGMENT
The United States Department of Commerce has selected one of the methodologies
suggested by the Court in its opinion ordering remand. No party alleges that the Court’s
directions were not followed nor are there any objections to the new calculation adjustments
made. Therefore, this case having been duly submitted for decision; and the court, after due
deliberation, having rendered a decision herein; now, in conformity with said decision it is
hereby
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Final Results of Second Remand
Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Ct. No. 16-00124, Doc. No. 96, by the United
1 States Department of Commerce are SUSTAINED.
__/s/Jane A. Restani_____ Jane A. Restani, Judge
Dated: May 7, 2019 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 CIT 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-sawblades-mfrs-coal-v-united-states-cit-2019.