Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United States
This text of 2018 CIT 25 (Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Slip Op. 18 - 25
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
: DIAMOND SAWBLADES : MANUFACTURERS COALITION, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Before: R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge : UNITED STATES, : Court No. 13-00241 : Defendant, : : and : : BEIJING GANG YAN DIAMOND : PRODUCTS COMPANY, GANG YAN : DIAMOND PRODUCTS, INC., CLIFF : INTERNATIONAL LTD., HUSQVARNA : CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS NORTH : AMERICA, INC., HEBEI HUSQVARNA-JIKAI : DIAMOND TOOLS CO., LTD., WEIHAI : XIANGGUANG MECHANICAL INDUSTRIAL : CO., LTD., BOSUN TOOLS CO., LTD., and : BOSUN TOOLS INC., : : Defendant-Intervenors. : :
JUDGMENT
This case having been instituted to challenge certain administrative review
determinations of the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce
(“Commerce”) published sub nom. Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China, 78 Fed. Reg. 36166 (June 17, 2013), as amended by Diamond Sawblades and
Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China, 78 Fed. Reg. 42930 (July 18, 2013); and the Court No. 13-00241 Page 2
matter having been remanded per slip opinion 14-112, ECF No. 87 (Sep. 23, 2014); and the
administrative results of redetermination, dated May 18, 2015, having been sustained and judgment
entered per slip opinion 15-116, ECF No. 118 (Oct. 21, 2015); and the case having been appealed
to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, ECF Nos. 120 & 121 (Nov. 20, 2015); and the
appellate court having affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for further consideration that
part of the decision that concerned Commerce’s determination on the timeliness of the plaintiff’s
targeted dumping allegation, 704 Fed. Appx. 924 (Aug. 7, 2017); and after issuance of the mandate
thereon, ECF No. 127 (Sep. 28, 2017), the case having been remanded to Commerce, Order of the
Court, ECF No. 128 (Oct. 3, 2017); and the results of that remand having been filed, ECF. No. 137
(Jan. 18, 2018); and the parties having filed a joint status report, ECF No. 138 (Jan. 25. 2018),
wherein they indicate (1) that “[o]n remand, the agency conducted a targeted dumping analysis, but
ultimately did not find targeting sufficient to warrant changes to its margin calculations”, id. at 2,
referencing ECF No. 137, (2) that “no further briefing is necessary”, id., and (3) that “the final
remand results may be sustained” as is, id.; Now, therefore, in view of the foregoing, and upon other
papers and proceedings, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Commerce’s Final Remand
Redetermination, Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. United States, CIT Consol. Ct.
No. 13-00241 (Jan. 19, 2018), ECF No. 137, be, and it hereby is, sustained.
/s/ R. Kenton Musgrave R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge Dated: March 22, 2018 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 CIT 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-sawblades-mfrs-coal-v-united-states-cit-2018.