Diamond Fruit Growers, Inc. v. State Tax Commission

463 P.2d 359, 254 Or. 619, 1969 Ore. LEXIS 414
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided December 31, 1969·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SLOAN, J.

Plaintiff qualifies for the tax benefits of the “processors’’ exemption statute” ORS 308.250. Subsection (1) of that statute fixes the assessment date for all personal property at January 1 of each year. Subsections (2) and (3) provide that the January 1 assessment may be cancelled for certain processed agricultural products. The property was canned fruits in this instance. The cancellation is allowed for goods in the “hands” of a processor “while being transported to or held in storage in a public or private warehouse,” if the processed fruit was “transported or shipped to another point before May 1 of the year of assessment.”

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diamond Fruit Growers, Inc. v. State Tax Commission, 463 P.2d 359, 254 Or. 619, 1969 Ore. LEXIS 414 (Or. 1969).

463 P.2d 359 (Diamond Fruit Growers, Inc. v. State Tax Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mrs. Smith's West Coast Pie Co. v. Department of Revenue
4 Or. Tax 398 (Oregon Tax Court, 1971)
Kolstad Canneries, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
4 Or. Tax 34 (Oregon Tax Court, 1969)