Diamond Coal Company v. White

77 So. 2d 372, 262 Ala. 112, 1955 Ala. LEXIS 395
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 13, 1955
Docket6 Div. 788
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 77 So. 2d 372 (Diamond Coal Company v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diamond Coal Company v. White, 77 So. 2d 372, 262 Ala. 112, 1955 Ala. LEXIS 395 (Ala. 1955).

Opinion

MERRILL, Justice.

This case involves a petition for certio-rari to review a decree in a workmen’s compensation proceeding in the circuit court of Marion County, Alabama, wherein the appellee was awarded the sum of $5,634 on his claim that he had contracted the disease of silicosis while in the employment of the appellant. It is admitted that there was no finding of facts by the court filed in this case.

Code of 1940, Title 26, § 304, requires that the court shall file in writing with the clerk a statement of the law and facts and conclusions as determined by the judge. In Richardson Lumber Co. v. Pounders, 254 Ala. 285, 48 So.2d 228, 229, the court said:

“It is the duty of the trial court to make sufficient detailed findings of fact so that the appellate court can determine whether the judgment or award is supported by the facts. If no findings are made by the lower court, it' is impossible for this Court to say whether the judgment is supported by the findings of whether there is any evidence to support the findings.”

In Bass v. Cowikee Mills, 257 Ala. 280, 58 So.2d 589, 590, we said:

“In the case at bar there was a statutory duty resting on the trial judge to make a findings of fact in accordance with § 304, Title 26, Code of 1940, and where this is not done, the cause must be reversed, when the judgment is in favor of the defendant just as much so as when the judgment is for the plaintiff. * * * ”

For the error indicated the judgment of the lower court must be reversed and .the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pinkney v. James B. Clow & Sons, Inc.
173 So. 2d 811 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1965)
Reynolds v. Kirby.
130 So. 2d 341 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1962)
West Point Manufacturing Co. v. Bennett
83 So. 2d 303 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 So. 2d 372, 262 Ala. 112, 1955 Ala. LEXIS 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-coal-company-v-white-ala-1955.