DIAMOND ALKALI COMPANY v. Godwin

Supreme Court of Georgia

DIAMOND ALKALI COMPANY v. Godwin

114 S.E.2d 40, 215 Ga. 839, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 354

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 7, 1960·No. 20799·Published

Opinion

Almand, Justice.

After a careful consideration of the record in this case and the decision made by the Court of Appeals (Diamond Alkali Co. v. Godwin, 100 Ga. App. 799, 112 S. E. 2d 365), we are of the opinion that that court did not err in affirming the judgment of the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Quillian, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Almand, Justice.

After a careful consideration of the record in this case and the decision made by the Court of Appeals (Diamond Alkali Co. v. Godwin, 100 Ga. App. 799, 112 S. E. 2d 365), we are of the opinion that that court did not err in affirming the judgment of the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Quillian, J., disqualified.

DIAMOND ALKALI COMPANY v. Godwin, 114 S.E.2d 40, 215 Ga. 839, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 354 (Ga. 1960).

Pincite

114 S.E.2d 40 (DIAMOND ALKALI COMPANY v. Godwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related