Dialysis Care of North Carolina, LLC v. Health & Human Services
538 S.E.2d 566
Opinion
DIALYSIS CARE OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC, d/b/a DCNC, LLC, d/b/a Dialysis Care of Rowan County, Petitioner,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF FACILITY SERVICES, CERTIFICATE OF NEED SECTION, Respondent, and
Bio-Medical Applications of North Carolina, Inc. d/b/a BMA of Kannapolis d/b/a Metrolina Kidney Center of Kannapolis (Lessee) and Metrolina Nephrology Associates, P.A. (Lessor), Respondent Intervenors.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Poyner & Spruill L.L.P., by William R. Shenton, Thomas R. West, and Pamela A. Scott, Raleigh, for petitioner-appellant.
Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by James A. Wellons, Special Deputy Attorney General, for respondent-appellee; and Law Office of Joy H. Thomas, by Joy H. Thomas, Raleigh, for respondent-intervenor-appellees.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dialysis Care of North Carolina, LLC v. Health & Human Services, 538 S.E.2d 566 (N.C. 2000).
538 S.E.2d 566 (Dialysis Care of North Carolina, LLC v. Health & Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.