Diallo v. Todria
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 31106(U) (Diallo v. Todria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, Kings County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Diallo v Todria 2025 NY Slip Op 31106(U) April 3, 2025 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 508141/2023 Judge: Anne J. Swern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2025 11:24 AM INDEX NO. 508141/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2025
At an IAS Trial Ten11, Part 75 ofthe Supreme Court ofthe·StateofNew York, Kings County; at the Courthouse locateq. at 360 Adams Street; Brooklyn, New York ori the 3rd day of April 2025. PRESENT: HON.ANNE 1. SWERN,.J.s.c.
NZINGAH DIALLO. DECISION & ORDER Plaintiff(s); Index No.: 508141/2023
-against- Calendar No.: 6 & 7
MAMUKATODRIA, GIA GIORGOBIANI, LYFT. INC., Motion Seq.: 001 -& 002 SEBASTIAN WILBERGER and AVALON SANDERS, . Return Date: 2/13/2025 Defendant(s).
Recitation of the following papers as required byCPLR 2219(a): Papers Numbered MS#l ·Wilberger's Notice ofMotion,Affirmation, Affidavits and Exhibits. (NYSCEF 20-29) ...................... ,.......... ,................ ... ,... l, 2 Affirmation and Exhibits in Opposition (NYSCEF 51-66) ........... ,.......... ,...........3 Reply Affirmation.{NYSCEF 66). ........................... ,....... ,...., ......... ,.................... ,,.,,.4
MS#:2 Lyft's Notice ofMotion, Affirmation, Affidavits and Exhibits (NYSCEF 31-41) ., ............. ,..................,....... ,..•..•... ;.... .5, 6 Affirmation arid Exhibits irt Opposition. (NYSCEF 56~61) .................................. 7 Reply Affirmation (NYSCEF 65) ................ ,..... '. .......... ,.. ,. ................................... 8
Upon the foregoing papers and after oral argument, the decisionand order ofthe Court
is as follows:
This is an action for personal injuries arising out of a two-vehicle accident.. Plaintiff was
a passenger in Giorgobiani 's vehicle. Plaintiff connected with Giorgobiani through Lyft..
.Lyft has moved for summary judgment based Ol) the affidavit of Giorgobiani thather
vehicle was struck when the Wilberger vehicle made a left tum (NYSCEF 38). The affidavit
states that Giorgobiani 's vehicle was stopped at a red light. In opposition~ plaintiff offers her pre'.'
trialtestimony during an Examination Under Oath conducted by American Transit Insurance
508141/2.023 Page 1 of4
1 of 4 [* 1] FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2025 11:24 AM INDEX NO. 508141/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2025
Company (NYSCEF 61). Plaintifftestified that the traffic lightwas green, and the vehicle was
moving at the time of the accident. However, Giorgobiani was looking down at her phone and
touching the buttons. (NYSCEF 42, ppA0-43). The Wilberger vehicle was a 1999 Mercury
Sedan with a Texas license plate number LXZ2693 (NYSCEF 52 and 58).
Wilberger moves to dismiss this action pursuant to CPLR § 3211 [a] (7] baSed on the
affidavits of his insurance broker, claims handler for Travelers Insurance Company, and
Wilberger. Wilberger states that on 9/25/22, he sold the 1999 Mercury for cash through
FacebookMarketplace and does not know the identities of the buyer (NYSCEF 26,pp.l-2).
Each affidavit• attests to the fact that on J 0/12/2022, plaintiff surrendered the New York State
license plates #KSJ8939 for the vehicle involved in this accident (NYSCEF 26-28). Wilberger
does not know the alleged driverAvalon Sanders (NYSCEF 26). 1 The claims handler obtained a
NYS DMV Registraticm Record Expansion that documents the voluntary plate surrender fot the
1999 grey Mercury sedan (NYSCEF 27, p. ll), and a Texas DMV search that revealed license
plate #LXZ2693 was registered to a White 2015 Infiniti QSO (id., p.9). However, the Registration
Record Expansion lists Wilbergeras the current owner ofthe vehicle as of 10/4/2023 (NYSCEF
27, p.11 ).2 Wilberger did not provide a title search for the 1999 Mercury sedan.
Both motions are denied.
When deciding a summary judgment motion, the Court's only role is to identify the
existence of triable issues, and not to determine the merits ofany such issues (Vega v Restani
Construction Corp., 18NY3d 499, 505 [2012]) or the credibility of the .movant's versicm of
.events (see Xiang Fu He v .Troon Management, Inc., 34 NY3d 167, .175 [2019] [internal citations
1 The1 poJice report documents that. Sanders was a passenger nodhe driver. The driver fled the scene. (NYSCEF 52 and 58); · ·· . 2 Wilberger's name and information does not appear in the "Prior Owners" section of the REGISTRATION RECORD EXPANSION, .
508141/2023 Pagei o/4
2 of 4 [* 2] FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2025 11:24 AM INDEX NO. 508141/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2025
omitted]). The Court nmst view the evidence in the light mostfavorable to the nprunoving party,
affording them the benefit of all reasonable inferences thatcan be drawn from the evidence (see
Negri v Shop & Stop, Inc.~ 65 NY2d 625, 626 [1985]).The motion should be denied where the
facts are in dispute, where different inferences tnay be drawn from the evidence; or where the
credibility of the witnesses is in question (see Cameron v City ofLong Beach, 297 AD2d 773;
774 [2d Dept. 2002]).
Although Lyft established a prima facie entitled to summary judgment, plaintiff
established a question of fact of whether Giorgobiani was looking down at her mobile phone at
the time of the accident. The Court cannot resolve the issues of credibility vis-a,.vis the
conflicting versions of events mGiorgobiani's affidavit and plaintiff's sworn testimony under
oath (Xiang Fu He v Troon Management; Inc., 34 NY3d 175). All drivers have a duty to see
whatthere is to be seen (Fi[ippazzo v Santiago, 277AD2d 419, 420 [2d Dept 2000] and Byrne v
Calogero; 96 AD3d 704,705 [2dDept2016]). A Jury must weigh the parties' credibility and
detennine whether Gioro biani. was negJigent by looking at her mo bile phone while driving. If
the jury answers this .question in the positive:, then it must then determine whether this conduct
was a "superseding cause which severed the causal connection'' between the negligence of
Wilberger's alleged driver while makingaleft turn and plaintiff's injuries{Adami v Wallace, 68 . . .. ·~·· ... AD3d.1397, 1399 [3 Dept 2009]).
Wilberger's tnotion to dismiss is denied based on the failure to submitthe results of a
New York and Texas DMV title· search for the vehicle irt question to determine the owner of the.
vehicle on the date of the accident. The plate surrender is insufficient to establish the transfer of
ownership of the vehicie because the Registration Record Expansioitstill lists \Vil berger as the
owner of the vehicle invoived in the accident The Court has considered Wiiberg¢r's argument
.S0SJ41ao2i Page3~ji
3 of 4 [* 3] FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2025 11:24 AM INDEX NO. 508141/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2025
concerning the cause of action for negligent entrustment and finds same to be without merit.
This argument overlooks the allegation that Wilberger was the operator of the motor vehicle on
the date of accident (NYSCEF 1, ,r9).
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that LYFT, INC. 's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint
per CPLR § 3212 is denied, and it is further
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 31106(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diallo-v-todria-nysupctkings-2025.