Diallo v. Ruan Transport Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 26, 2021·No. 1:18-cv-01834-KNF·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ne en ee ee ne ee ene KX OUSMANE H. DIALLO, : Plaintiff, : - against - : ORDER 18-CV-1834 (KNF) RUAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION and ERIC C. RAMIREZ, : Defendants. : nen en ee nee ne en ene nen eee XY KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In the parties’ joint pretrial order, the defendants identify several physicians from whom, it appears, the defendants will seek, without objection, to elicit opinion evidence, as contemplated by Rules 702 and 703 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. To enable the Court to perform its gatekeeping obligation, see Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993), and determine, inter alia, whether the prospective physician witnesses should be allowed to give opinion evidence at the trial of this action, on or before August 10, 2021, the defendants shall file evidence, via affidavit(s) or otherwise, and a memorandum of law establishing that the prospective witnesses’ respective opinions should be received in evidence at the trial. Dated: New York, New York SO ORDERED: July 26, 2021 KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diallo v. Ruan Transport Corporation, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Diallo v. Ruan Transport Corporation (Diallo v. Ruan Transport Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 1993)