Diallo v. Mukasey

Fourth Circuit

Diallo v. Mukasey

275 F. App'x 223

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2008·No. 07-1311·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sadio Diallo, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Diallo’s motion to reopen as untimely. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (West 2005 & Supp. 2007); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Diallo, No. A97-622-486 (B.I.A. Mar. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Sadio Diallo, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Diallo’s motion to reopen as untimely. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (West 2005 & Supp. 2007); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Diallo, No. A97-622-486 (B.I.A. Mar. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Diallo v. Mukasey, 275 F. App'x 223 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

275 F. App'x 223 (Diallo v. Mukasey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related