Diallo v. Kaba

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 19, 2009
Docket09-6410
StatusUnpublished

This text of Diallo v. Kaba (Diallo v. Kaba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diallo v. Kaba, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6410

MAMADOU BAILO DIALLO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MORY KARAMOKO KABA, Mr., Consul for the embassy of the Republic of Guinea; ALY KAMARA, Mr., Director of Operations of the embassy; MADAME PAUL, Ms., Personal Assistant of the Consul,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-00291-AW)

Submitted: July 16, 2009 Decided: August 19, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mamadou Bailo Diallo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mamadou B. Diallo appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition without

prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(5) (2006)

(providing that “[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law

. . ., including section 2241 of title 28, . . . a petition for

review filed with an appropriate court of appeals . . . shall be

the sole and exclusive means for judicial review of an order of

removal entered or issued under any provision of this Act”). We

deny the pending motion for a transcript at government expense.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Diallo v. Kaba, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diallo-v-kaba-ca4-2009.