Diallo v. Holder

468 F. App'x 315
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Diallo v. Holder. Read the opinion of the Court — 332 F. App'x 47
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2012·No. No. 11-1874·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alpha Oumar Diallo, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Diallo’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Diallo, (B.I.A. July 13, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diallo v. Holder, 468 F. App'x 315 (4th Cir. 2012).

468 F. App'x 315 (Diallo v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related