Dial v. State
752 So. 2d 555, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 607, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 2176, 1999 WL 1190748
Opinion
We have for review State v. Dial 730 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), which expressly and directly conflicts with the opinions in State v. Holland, 689 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), and State v. Perry, 716 So.2d 327 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. For reasons expressed in our opinion in Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999), the decision of the Fourth District is hereby quashed. We remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dial v. State, 752 So. 2d 555, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 607, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 2176, 1999 WL 1190748 (Fla. 1999).
752 So. 2d 555 (Dial v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Perry
716 So. 2d 327 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Hayes v. State
750 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
State v. Holland
689 So. 2d 1268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
State v. Dial
730 So. 2d 813 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)