Dial v. Rector

12 Tex. 99
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1854·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Lipscomb, J.

In this case, a motion has been submitted to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the appeal bond was made after the death of the obligees. It is clear, that the bond, so made, is a nullity; and as, according to the decisions of this Court, an appeal bond is essential to the exercise of the jurisdiction of the Court, by appeal, the motion to dismiss must be sustained. A question of practice was made, as to how the fact of the death of the pbligee, before the bond was made, shall be proven in this Court. We have no doubt that [100] it is competent to show the fact by affidavit, as has been done in this case. See case of Harris v. Hopson, 5 Tex. R. 529.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dial v. Rector, 12 Tex. 99 (Tex. 1854).

12 Tex. 99 (Dial v. Rector) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberson v. Keck
108 S.W.2d 840 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Cutbirth v. Knowles
48 S.W.2d 649 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Saner-Ragley Lumber Co. v. Spivey
230 S.W. 878 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Henningsmeyer v. First State Bank of Conroe
195 S.W. 1137 (Texas Supreme Court, 1918)
Simmang v. Cheney
155 S.W. 1198 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Boggess v. Harris
39 S.W. 565 (Texas Supreme Court, 1897)
Futch v. Palmer
32 S.W. 566 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1895)
Smith & Williams v. Parks
55 Tex. 82 (Texas Supreme Court, 1881)
Hart v. Mills
31 Tex. 304 (Texas Supreme Court, 1868)
Johnson v. Robeson
27 Tex. 526 (Texas Supreme Court, 1864)
Brown v. Torrey
22 Tex. 54 (Texas Supreme Court, 1858)