Diago v. State
This text of 427 So. 2d 233 (Diago v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The conviction under review and oral adjudication of guilt in a non-jury trial is hereby affirmed. The written adjudication being contrary to the oral finding of guilt, the adjudication and sentence are vacated and the matter returned to the trial court for readjudication and resentencing. See and compare: Perkins v. Mayo, 92 So.2d 641 (Fla.1957); Paulk v. State, 376 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
427 So. 2d 233, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diago-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.