Diago v. State

427 So. 2d 233, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20253
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 1983·No. No. 82-961·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The conviction under review and oral adjudication of guilt in a non-jury trial is hereby affirmed. The written adjudication being contrary to the oral finding of guilt, the adjudication and sentence are vacated and the matter returned to the trial court for readjudication and resentencing. See and compare: Perkins v. Mayo, 92 So.2d 641 (Fla.1957); Paulk v. State, 376 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diago v. State, 427 So. 2d 233, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20253 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

427 So. 2d 233 (Diago v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perkins v. Mayo
92 So. 2d 641 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Paulk v. State
376 So. 2d 1213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)