Dia-Log Co. v. Anderson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Dia-Log Co. v. Anderson

165 So. 2d 610, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1781

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 10, 1964

DocketNo. 10215

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 165 So. 2d 610 (Dia-Log Co. v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dia-Log Co. v. Anderson, 165 So. 2d 610, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1781 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

AYRES, Judge.

In this action wherein plaintiff provided labor and materials in connection with the drilling and completion of an oil and gas well known as T. J. Owens No. 1 Well, in Richland Parish, Louisiana, it sought judgment upon its account for recognition of a lien and privilege upon the drilling rig and equipment located on the leased premises. H. T. Pannell intervened, claiming the ownership of 80 joints, 30-ft. lengths of in. I. F. drill pipe which he loaned to A. T. Farr, Jr., for use in the drilling of said well, and sought delivery of said pipe to him free of laborers’ and materialmen’s liens.

This action was consolidated with the case of Fred E. Cooper, Inc. v. Farr, La.App., 165 So.2d 605, this day decided.

As pointed out in the opinion in the consolidated case, plaintiff’s labor and material lien extends to all property located on the leased premises and used in connection with the drilling and completion of the well.

Therefore, for the reasons therein and herein assigned, the judgment appealed is affirmed at intervenors-appellants’ cost.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AYRES, Judge.

In this action wherein plaintiff provided labor and materials in connection with the drilling and completion of an oil and gas well known as T. J. Owens No. 1 Well, in Richland Parish, Louisiana, it sought judgment upon its account for recognition of a lien and privilege upon the drilling rig and equipment located on the leased premises. H. T. Pannell intervened, claiming the ownership of 80 joints, 30-ft. lengths of in. I. F. drill pipe which he loaned to A. T. Farr, Jr., for use in the drilling of said well, and sought delivery of said pipe to him free of laborers’ and materialmen’s liens.

This action was consolidated with the case of Fred E. Cooper, Inc. v. Farr, La.App., 165 So.2d 605, this day decided.

As pointed out in the opinion in the consolidated case, plaintiff’s labor and material lien extends to all property located on the leased premises and used in connection with the drilling and completion of the well.

Therefore, for the reasons therein and herein assigned, the judgment appealed is affirmed at intervenors-appellants’ cost.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 So. 2d 610, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dia-log-co-v-anderson-lactapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack