Di Vosta v. Boam Corp.
110 So. 2d 42, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 3136
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 1959·No. No. 58-582·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The court has carefully considered the assignments of error, briefs, the record of the proceedings below, and oral argument of counsel for the respective parties. The burden here of clearly demonstrating error is upon the appellants. We conclude they have failed to carry that burden and failing so to do, the judgment appealed should be and it is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Di Vosta v. Boam Corp., 110 So. 2d 42, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 3136 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).
110 So. 2d 42 (Di Vosta v. Boam Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reefer Transportation, Inc. v. Hoffman
174 So. 2d 461 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Cleeland v. Miami Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
159 So. 2d 260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Lemay v. Garcia
164 So. 2d 565 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)