Di Vosta v. Boam Corp.
110 So. 2d 42, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 3136
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 24, 1959
DocketNo. 58-582
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 110 So. 2d 42 (Di Vosta v. Boam Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Di Vosta v. Boam Corp., 110 So. 2d 42, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 3136 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).
Opinion
The court has carefully considered the assignments of error, briefs, the record of the proceedings below, and oral argument of counsel for the respective parties. The burden here of clearly demonstrating error is upon the appellants. We conclude they have failed to carry that burden and failing so to do, the judgment appealed should be and it is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Reefer Transportation, Inc. v. Hoffman
174 So. 2d 461 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Cleeland v. Miami Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
159 So. 2d 260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Lemay v. Garcia
164 So. 2d 565 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
110 So. 2d 42, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 3136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-vosta-v-boam-corp-fladistctapp-1959.