Di Vona v. Lee

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Di Vona v. Lee

1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 53

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedMarch 1, 1918

DocketNo. 41408

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 53 (Di Vona v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Di Vona v. Lee, 1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 53 (R.I. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

DORAN, J.

There is a mass of testimony which if true tends to show liability and the jury have found liability proven.

For plaintiff: Sullivan & Sullivan, and D. A. Colton. For defendant: Frank H. Wildes.

As to the amount of damages awarded, the evidence is such that in my opinion the severity of injury indicated by the jury’s award is not supported hy the weight of the evidence.

New trial granted unless plaintiff withm ten days of notice of this decision remits all damages in excess of eight hundred dollars.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DORAN, J.

There is a mass of testimony which if true tends to show liability and the jury have found liability proven.

For plaintiff: Sullivan & Sullivan, and D. A. Colton. For defendant: Frank H. Wildes.

As to the amount of damages awarded, the evidence is such that in my opinion the severity of injury indicated by the jury’s award is not supported hy the weight of the evidence.

New trial granted unless plaintiff withm ten days of notice of this decision remits all damages in excess of eight hundred dollars.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-vona-v-lee-risuperct-1918.