D.I. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.I. v. State

519 So. 2d 739, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 386, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 484, 1988 WL 8114

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 9, 1988

DocketNo. 86-2794

StatusPublished

This text of 519 So. 2d 739 (D.I. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D.I. v. State, 519 So. 2d 739, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 386, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 484, 1988 WL 8114 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant D.I. challenges the court’s order finding him guilty of grand theft, burglary of a conveyance, criminal mischief, and resisting arrest without violence; and adjudicating him delinquent based upon the finding that he committed the offenses of grand theft and burglary.¹ Holding that the state failed to produce sufficient evidence to support the convictions, we reverse. See R.M. v. State, 450 So.2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); R.M. v. State, 412 So.2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); R.A.L. v. State, 402 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); B.L.W. v. State, 393 So.2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). See also B.P. v. State, 515 So.2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); C.P.P. v. State, 479 So.2d 858 (Fla 1st DCA 1985); J.K. v. State, 448 So.2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant D.I. challenges the court’s order finding him guilty of grand theft, burglary of a conveyance, criminal mischief, and resisting arrest without violence; and adjudicating him delinquent based upon the finding that he committed the offenses of grand theft and burglary.¹ Holding that the state failed to produce sufficient evidence to support the convictions, we reverse. See R.M. v. State, 450 So.2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); R.M. v. State, 412 So.2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); R.A.L. v. State, 402 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); B.L.W. v. State, 393 So.2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). See also B.P. v. State, 515 So.2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); C.P.P. v. State, 479 So.2d 858 (Fla 1st DCA 1985); J.K. v. State, 448 So.2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

519 So. 2d 739, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 386, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 484, 1988 WL 8114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack