Di Tullio v. Di Tullio
146 A. 913, 104 N.J. Eq. 496, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 546
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 102 N. J. Eq. 141.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 15.
For reversal— None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Di Tullio v. Di Tullio, 146 A. 913, 104 N.J. Eq. 496, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 546 (N.J. 1929).
146 A. 913 (Di Tullio v. Di Tullio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
B. v. S.
240 A.2d 189 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)