Di Tommaso v. Brookhattan Utilities, Inc.
This text of 40 A.D.2d 989 (Di Tommaso v. Brookhattan Utilities, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[990]*990Three judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, one in each of the first three above-entitled actions, entered March 30, 1972, March 29, 1972 and April 3, 1972, respectively, affirmed, with one bill of costs, jointly to respondents appearing separately in said actions, and jointly against appellants therein. In the fourth above-entitled action, judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered April 24, 1972, affirmed, without costs. The refusal of the trial court to charge the jury that the State trooper was a disinterested witness was harmless error. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Gulotta and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 A.D.2d 989, 338 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-tommaso-v-brookhattan-utilities-inc-nyappdiv-1972.