Home/New York Court of Appeals/di Suvero v. Gem Window Cleaning Co.

di Suvero v. Gem Window Cleaning Co.

218 N.E.2d 317, 17 N.Y.2d 831, 271 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1332
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 2, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 218 N.E.2d 317 (di Suvero v. Gem Window Cleaning Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
di Suvero v. Gem Window Cleaning Co., 218 N.E.2d 317, 17 N.Y.2d 831, 271 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1332 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. We pass upon no other question. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Ftjld, Van Voobhis, Bubke, Scileppi and Bebgan. Judge Keating dissents and votes to reverse upon the ground that the questions of fact were properly submitted to the jury by the Trial Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 N.E.2d 317, 17 N.Y.2d 831, 271 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-suvero-v-gem-window-cleaning-co-ny-1966.