Di Silvestro v. Gray

194 F.2d 355
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 21, 1952·No. 11048_1·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court, dismissing the complaint, is affirmed. Appellant has had his day in court. Di Silvestro v. United States Veterans’ Administration, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1949, 81 F.Supp. 844, affirmed 2 Cir., 1949, 173 F.2d 933, amended complaint dismissed, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1950, 10 F.R. D. 20, affirmed 2 Cir., 1950, 181 F.2d 502, certiorari denied 1950, 339 U.S. 989, 70 S.Ct. 1014, 94 L.Ed. 1390. Having lost the previous litigation on its merits, appellant cannot now relitigate his cause simply by choosing another forum and by naming as defendant the Administrator of Veterans’ Affairs, in his official capacity as head of the Veterans’ Administration, rather than (as previously) suing the Veterans’ Administration as such. See also Baxter v. Pace, 89 U.S.App.D.C.-, 193 F.2d 20.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Di Silvestro v. Gray, 194 F.2d 355 (D.C. Cir. 1952).

194 F.2d 355 (Di Silvestro v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenson v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management
828 F. Supp. 2d 174 (District of Columbia, 2011)
Wilson v. Fulwood
District of Columbia, 2011
Wilson v. Fullwood
772 F. Supp. 2d 246 (District of Columbia, 2011)
Joseph W. Di Silvestro v. United States
767 F.2d 30 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Blanche H. Lober v. Willis Moore
417 F.2d 714 (D.C. Circuit, 1969)
Di Silvestro v. United States
268 F. Supp. 516 (E.D. New York, 1966)
Di Silvestro v. United States Veterans' Administration
132 F. Supp. 692 (E.D. New York, 1955)