Di Sabato v. Soffes

11 A.D.2d 981, 207 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7915
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment in favor of Marion Di Sabato unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict thereon to $6,000, in which event the judgment, as so modified, is affirmed, with costs to appellants. Judgment in favor of Patricia Pescatore unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict thereon to $6,000, in which event the judgment, as so modified, is affirmed, with costs to appellants. On this record the verdicts are excessive. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Di Sabato v. Soffes, 11 A.D.2d 981, 207 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

11 A.D.2d 981 (Di Sabato v. Soffes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Starbo v. Ruddy
66 A.D.2d 950 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)