Di Rose v. Morse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Di Rose v. Morse

225 A.D.2d 959, 639 N.Y.2d 746, 639 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2763

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 959 (Di Rose v. Morse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Di Rose v. Morse, 225 A.D.2d 959, 639 N.Y.2d 746, 639 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Petitioner, a prison inmate, attempted to send a card to an inmate at a Federal prison and was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule regulating inmate correspondence. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, there is substantial evidence in the record to support respondent’s finding that petitioner sent mail to another inmate without authorization. As for petitioner’s contention on administrative appeal that the misbehavior report was written in retaliation for prior grievances he had filed, he failed to submit evidence to substantiate this claim. We have considered petitioner’s remaining claims and find that they are either not properly before this Court or are without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner, a prison inmate, attempted to send a card to an inmate at a Federal prison and was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule regulating inmate correspondence. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, there is substantial evidence in the record to support respondent’s finding that petitioner sent mail to another inmate without authorization. As for petitioner’s contention on administrative appeal that the misbehavior report was written in retaliation for prior grievances he had filed, he failed to submit evidence to substantiate this claim. We have considered petitioner’s remaining claims and find that they are either not properly before this Court or are without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 A.D.2d 959, 639 N.Y.2d 746, 639 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-rose-v-morse-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack