Di Rose v. Morse

225 A.D.2d 959, 639 N.Y.2d 746, 639 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2763
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Petitioner, a prison inmate, attempted to send a card to an inmate at a Federal prison and was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule regulating inmate correspondence. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, there is substantial evidence in the record to support respondent’s finding that petitioner sent mail to another inmate without authorization. As for petitioner’s contention on administrative appeal that the misbehavior report was written in retaliation for prior grievances he had filed, he failed to submit evidence to substantiate this claim. We have considered petitioner’s remaining claims and find that they are either not properly before this Court or are without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Di Rose v. Morse, 225 A.D.2d 959, 639 N.Y.2d 746, 639 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

225 A.D.2d 959 (Di Rose v. Morse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hendricks v. Selsky
241 A.D.2d 745 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)