Di Resto v. Long Island Lighting Co.

61 A.D.2d 789, 401 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10205
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 6, 1978·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 26, 1977, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order and denied defendant’s cross motion to compel compliance with its notice of discovery and inspection. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements; motion denied and cross motion granted; and plaintiffs are directed to comply with item 2 of the notice of discovery and inspection; items 3, 4 and 5 of the notice were sought only as an alternative to discovery and inspection of item 2. The latter was not a privileged item and is within the proper realm of discoverable material. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Di Resto v. Long Island Lighting Co., 61 A.D.2d 789, 401 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10205 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

61 A.D.2d 789 (Di Resto v. Long Island Lighting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaszovitz v. Weiszman
110 A.D.2d 117 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)