Di Paolo v. Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders
745 A.2d 540, 162 N.J. 572, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 137
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Collester’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 322 N.J.Super. 487, 731 A.2d 519 (1999).
For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices O’HERN, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO and LaVECCHIA — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Di Paolo v. Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders, 745 A.2d 540, 162 N.J. 572, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 137 (N.J. 2000).
745 A.2d 540 (Di Paolo v. Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Merlino v. Borough of Midland Park
796 A.2d 203 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2002)
Troy v. Rutgers
774 A.2d 476 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2001)
Miskowitz v. Union County Utilities Authority
764 A.2d 455 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
Golden v. County of Union
749 A.2d 842 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2000)
State v. Russo
745 A.2d 540 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2000)