Di Mattia v. Di Mattia

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Di Mattia v. Di Mattia

243 So. 2d 817, 257 La. 735, 1971 La. LEXIS 4456

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 17, 1971

DocketNo. 51189

StatusPublished

This text of 243 So. 2d 817 (Di Mattia v. Di Mattia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Di Mattia v. Di Mattia, 243 So. 2d 817, 257 La. 735, 1971 La. LEXIS 4456 (La. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition of the relator in the above ■entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Thomas B. Pugh, Judge of the Family Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the third day of May, 1971, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through his attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition of the relator in the above ■entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Thomas B. Pugh, Judge of the Family Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the third day of May, 1971, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through his attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 So. 2d 817, 257 La. 735, 1971 La. LEXIS 4456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-mattia-v-di-mattia-la-1971.