Di Matteo v. State
40 N.Y.2d 978
This text of 40 N.Y.2d 978 (Di Matteo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Di Matteo v. State, 40 N.Y.2d 978 (N.Y. 1976).
Opinion
Order reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the Court of Claims reinstated for the reasons stated in the opinion by Judge Daniel Becker at the Court of Claims.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Gabrielli, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke. Judges Jasen and Jones dissent and vote to affirm on the opinion by Mr. Justice Michael E. Sweeney at the Appellate Division (49 AD2d 271).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Di Matteo v. State
49 A.D.2d 271 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 N.Y.2d 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-matteo-v-state-ny-1976.