Di Maria v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation
52 A.2d 698, 135 N.J.L. 470, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 226
Opinion
The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Colie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, DONGES, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, WELLS, RAFFERTY, DILL, FREUND, McGEEHAN, McLEAN, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Di Maria v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation, 52 A.2d 698, 135 N.J.L. 470, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 226 (N.J. 1947).
52 A.2d 698 (Di Maria v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.