Di Lorenzo v. Cuozzi

57 A.D.2d 584, 393 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11566

This text of 57 A.D.2d 584 (Di Lorenzo v. Cuozzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Di Lorenzo v. Cuozzi, 57 A.D.2d 584, 393 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11566 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to rescind a contract for the sale of real property, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered December 7, 1976, which denied their motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The presence of a general merger clause does not preclude the plaintiffs-respondents from claiming fraudulent representations in an action to rescind the contract (see Galgani v Fleming, 56 AD2d 644). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Mollen and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Galgani v. Fleming
56 A.D.2d 644 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.2d 584, 393 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-lorenzo-v-cuozzi-nyappdiv-1977.