Di Lillo v. Stamatis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Di Lillo v. Stamatis

32 A.D.2d 646, 301 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4021

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 646 (Di Lillo v. Stamatis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Di Lillo v. Stamatis, 32 A.D.2d 646, 301 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 3, 1968, modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting the condition therein and by adding a direction that all three actions, as consolidated, are to be placed on the October 1969 Term Calendar, with all pretrial procedures to be completed by September 1, 1969. As so modified, order affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements to appellants against plaintiffs appearing separately in Actions 1 and 2. These three actions arose out of a two-ear automobile accident. All of them should be tried together, to avoid duplicating trials and unnecessary expense to both the parties and the court. Brennan, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 3, 1968, modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting the condition therein and by adding a direction that all three actions, as consolidated, are to be placed on the October 1969 Term Calendar, with all pretrial procedures to be completed by September 1, 1969. As so modified, order affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements to appellants against plaintiffs appearing separately in Actions 1 and 2. These three actions arose out of a two-ear automobile accident. All of them should be tried together, to avoid duplicating trials and unnecessary expense to both the parties and the court. Brennan, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 646, 301 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-lillo-v-stamatis-nyappdiv-1969.