Di Gennaro v. Commonwealth & Dominion Line, Ltd.

222 A.D. 761

Opinion

Order and judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, ■with costs, and verdict in favor of plaintiff reinstated. (McGovern v. C. V. R. R. Co., 123 N. Y. 280, 286, 287; Henry v. Hudson & Manhattan R. R. Co., 201 id. 140, 142.) Rich, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result; Kapper, J., dissents and votes to affirm upon authority of Perry v. Rogers (157 N. Y. 251).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Di Gennaro v. Commonwealth & Dominion Line, Ltd., 222 A.D. 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

222 A.D. 761 (Di Gennaro v. Commonwealth & Dominion Line, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry v. . Rogers
51 N.E. 1021 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
McGovern v. Central Vermont R. R.
25 N.E. 373 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)