Di Francesco v. Di Francesco

23 A.D.2d 740, 258 N.Y.S.2d 237, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4427
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1965·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order of commitment, entered on August 19, 1964, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The papers on appeal contain two notices of appeal: the first, from the order of August 19, 1964 aforesaid; the second, apparently abandoned, from an order dated August 12, 1964, not in the record on appeal. The order of August 19, 1964 is predicated on a hearing of August 12, 1964, the minutes of which are not before us. The underlying order of protection dated July 23, 1964 is grounded on a hearing of that day, the minutes of which are not part of the record on appeal. It is impossible to pass on the merits of the appeal. Appellant having submitted the appeal on an incomplete and insufficient record must abide the consequences. (See E. P. Reynolds, Inc. v. Nager Elec. Co., 21 A D 2d 306.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Di Francesco v. Di Francesco, 23 A.D.2d 740, 258 N.Y.S.2d 237, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

23 A.D.2d 740 (Di Francesco v. Di Francesco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Provencal-Dayle v. Dayle
50 A.D.3d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
DiPasquale v. Security Mutual Life Insurance
293 A.D.2d 394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Sandcham Realty Corp. v. Taub
292 A.D.2d 304 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Grossman v. Meller
251 A.D.2d 214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)