Di Fabrizzio v. Clarity
This text of 273 A.D. 769 (Di Fabrizzio v. Clarity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action to recover damages for the unauthorized use by defendant, a photog[770]*770rapher, of pictures of plaintiffs’ daughter for trade purposes. Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. (Holmes v. Underwood & Underwood, Inc., 225 App. Div. 360.) Hagatty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 775.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D. 769, 74 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1947 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-fabrizzio-v-clarity-nyappdiv-1947.