Di Carlo v. Bravo Tours, Inc.
This text of 129 A.D.2d 552 (Di Carlo v. Bravo Tours, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Spantax Airlines appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Owen, J.), entered May 28, 1986, which denied its motion to vacate a default judgment of the same court entered October 28, 1985 against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, the motion is granted, the default judgment is vacated and the plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the defendant Spantax Airlines.
The plaintiffs failed to take proceedings for the entry of a judgment within one year after the default of the defendant Spantax Airlines and there is no excuse provided for this failure. Furthermore, there was no demonstrated merit to the plaintiffs’ action as against Spantax Airlines. Therefore, the complaint should be dismissed insofar as it is asserted against Spantax Airlines (see, CPLR 3215 [c]; Baldwin v St. Clare’s Hosp., 63 AD2d 761). Brown, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 A.D.2d 552, 514 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-carlo-v-bravo-tours-inc-nyappdiv-1987.