Di Brigida v. Di Brigida
172 A. 505, 116 N.J. Eq. 208, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 696
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Advisory Master Campbell.
For affirmance — The Citiee-Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Peeskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Di Brigida v. Di Brigida, 172 A. 505, 116 N.J. Eq. 208, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 696 (N.J. 1934).
172 A. 505 (Di Brigida v. Di Brigida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Payne v. Payne
63 A.2d 549 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)
Bowers v. Bowers
65 A.2d 116 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Butler v. District of Columbia
153 F.2d 617 (D.C. Circuit, 1946)
Shilkret v. Helvering
138 F.2d 925 (D.C. Circuit, 1943)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Esenwein v. Esenwein
35 A.2d 335 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
In re the Estate of Ainscow
34 A.2d 593 (Delaware Orphan's Court, 1943)
Sprague v. Sprague
131 N.J. Eq. 104 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1942)
Comfort v. Comfort
112 P.2d 259 (California Supreme Court, 1941)
In re the Estate of Miller
162 Misc. 563 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1937)