Di Bella v. Di Bella
This text of 392 N.E.2d 564 (Di Bella v. Di Bella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division. In addition, plaintiffs constitutional challenge to the statute on equal protection grounds, having been raised for the first time on this appeal, is not entitled to be reviewed by us. It has long been the settled rule that, unless a constitutional argument is properly raised for decision below, it will not be considered in this court (see National Organization for Women v State Div. of Human Rights, 32 NY2d 940; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 162, pp 630-631; § 169, p 641).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
392 N.E.2d 564, 47 N.Y.2d 828, 418 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-bella-v-di-bella-ny-1979.