Di Angelo v. Keenan

181 A. 44, 115 N.J.L. 507, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 332
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 9, 1935·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Di Angelo v. Keenan, 181 A. 44, 115 N.J.L. 507, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 332 (N.J. 1935).

181 A. 44 (Di Angelo v. Keenan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Small v. Department of Corrections
579 A.2d 1263 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
Parsippany Hills Assoc. v. Rent Leveling Bd.
476 A.2d 271 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
Brennan v. Byrne
157 A.2d 303 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)
Cetrulo v. Byrne
157 A.2d 297 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)
Lohmann v. Lohmann
141 A.2d 84 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)