Dhooge Bros. v. Mecho
15 A.D.2d 774, 224 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11209
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 27, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 15 A.D.2d 774 (Dhooge Bros. v. Mecho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dhooge Bros. v. Mecho, 15 A.D.2d 774, 224 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11209 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).
Opinion
Plaintiff has failed to set forth sufficient facts establishing misrepresentation or fraud on the part of the moving defendant who was not a party to the contract. “ Fraud cannot be inferred, it must be proved.” (Anderson v. Malley, 191 App. Div. 573, 575.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vom Lehn v. Astor Art Galleries, Ltd.
86 Misc. 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
Reeder v. Mastercraft Electronics Corp.
297 F. Supp. 815 (S.D. New York, 1969)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.2d 774, 224 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dhooge-bros-v-mecho-nyappdiv-1962.