DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse
318 A.2d 19, 64 N.J. 548
Opinion
D.H.M. INDUSTRIES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CENTRAL PORT WAREHOUSES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND CORBIN-BAY REALTY CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, D.H. OVERMYER, CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND D.H. OVERMYER CO., INC., AN OHIO CORPORATION, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
*549 Mr. Burton T. Cohen, argued the cause for appellant (Walter Henry Jones, attorney).
Mr. David J. Goldberg, argued the cause for respondent D.H.M. Industries, Inc. (Messrs. Warren, Goldberg & Berman, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority's per curiam opinion.
For affirmance Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD 6.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse, 318 A.2d 19, 64 N.J. 548 (N.J. 1974).
318 A.2d 19 (DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
D. H. M. Industries, Inc. v. Central Port Warehouses, Inc.
318 A.2d 19 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1974)