DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse
This text of 318 A.2d 19 (DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
D.H.M. INDUSTRIES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CENTRAL PORT WAREHOUSES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND CORBIN-BAY REALTY CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, D.H. OVERMYER, CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND D.H. OVERMYER CO., INC., AN OHIO CORPORATION, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
*549 Mr. Burton T. Cohen, argued the cause for appellant (Walter Henry Jones, attorney).
Mr. David J. Goldberg, argued the cause for respondent D.H.M. Industries, Inc. (Messrs. Warren, Goldberg & Berman, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority's per curiam opinion.
For affirmance Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD 6.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
318 A.2d 19, 64 N.J. 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dhm-industries-v-central-port-warehouse-nj-1974.