DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse

318 A.2d 19, 64 N.J. 548
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 2, 1974·Published

Opinion

64 N.J. 548 (1974)
318 A.2d 19

D.H.M. INDUSTRIES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CENTRAL PORT WAREHOUSES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND CORBIN-BAY REALTY CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, D.H. OVERMYER, CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND D.H. OVERMYER CO., INC., AN OHIO CORPORATION, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 19, 1974.
Decided April 2, 1974.

*549 Mr. Burton T. Cohen, argued the cause for appellant (Walter Henry Jones, attorney).

Mr. David J. Goldberg, argued the cause for respondent D.H.M. Industries, Inc. (Messrs. Warren, Goldberg & Berman, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority's per curiam opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 6.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse, 318 A.2d 19, 64 N.J. 548 (N.J. 1974).

318 A.2d 19 (DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D. H. M. Industries, Inc. v. Central Port Warehouses, Inc.
318 A.2d 19 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1974)