DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse

318 A.2d 19, 64 N.J. 548
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 2, 1974
StatusPublished

This text of 318 A.2d 19 (DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse, 318 A.2d 19, 64 N.J. 548 (N.J. 1974).

Opinion

64 N.J. 548 (1974)
318 A.2d 19

D.H.M. INDUSTRIES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CENTRAL PORT WAREHOUSES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND CORBIN-BAY REALTY CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, D.H. OVERMYER, CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND D.H. OVERMYER CO., INC., AN OHIO CORPORATION, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 19, 1974.
Decided April 2, 1974.

*549 Mr. Burton T. Cohen, argued the cause for appellant (Walter Henry Jones, attorney).

Mr. David J. Goldberg, argued the cause for respondent D.H.M. Industries, Inc. (Messrs. Warren, Goldberg & Berman, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority's per curiam opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 6.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D. H. M. Industries, Inc. v. Central Port Warehouses, Inc.
318 A.2d 19 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
318 A.2d 19, 64 N.J. 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dhm-industries-v-central-port-warehouse-nj-1974.