DHL Network Operations (USA) Inc v. Federal Aviation Title Company of Oklahoma LLC

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma
DecidedJune 10, 2019
Docket5:18-cv-00429
StatusUnknown

This text of DHL Network Operations (USA) Inc v. Federal Aviation Title Company of Oklahoma LLC (DHL Network Operations (USA) Inc v. Federal Aviation Title Company of Oklahoma LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DHL Network Operations (USA) Inc v. Federal Aviation Title Company of Oklahoma LLC, (W.D. Okla. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

DHL NETWORK OPERATIONS ) (USA), INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -vs- ) Case No. CIV-18-0429-F ) FEDERAL AVIATION TITLE ) COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA LLC, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor DHL Network Operations (USA), Inc. has notified the court that Defendant/Judgment Debtor Christina Klein has commenced a case under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Plaintiff advises that it is not aware that the other defendant, Defendant/Judgment Debtor Federal Aviation Title Company of Oklahoma, LLC, has commenced a bankruptcy action, but that the schedules filed in Klein’s bankruptcy action include debts of that entity. The automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1) applies to “the commencement or continuation … of a judicial … proceeding against the debtor that was … commenced before the commencement of” the bankruptcy.” Those conditions are met with respect to the evidentiary hearing previously set for June 14, 2019. Accordingly, based on the stay, the June 14 hearing, which was for the purpose of taking evidence on plaintiff’s request that defendants be held in contempt for their failure to appear for hearings set by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell, is STRICKEN. See generally, In re Atkins, 176 B.R. 998, 1005-06 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1994) (civil contempt proceedings not excepted from automatic stay). Plaintiff is DIRECTED to promptly advise the court when the stay 1s lifted, and to advise the court, at that time, whether plaintiff seeks to pursue civil contempt. Plaintiff SHALL serve a copy of this order on the defendants and file proof of service no later than noon on June 13, 2019. Dated this 10 day of June, 2019.

STEPHEN P. FRIOT . UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18-0429p013.docx

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atkins v. Martinez (In Re Atkins)
176 B.R. 998 (D. Minnesota, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
DHL Network Operations (USA) Inc v. Federal Aviation Title Company of Oklahoma LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dhl-network-operations-usa-inc-v-federal-aviation-title-company-of-okwd-2019.