D'HAITI v. McDonough

954 So. 2d 712, 2007 WL 1173773
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 23, 2007
Docket1D05-4992
StatusPublished

This text of 954 So. 2d 712 (D'HAITI v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D'HAITI v. McDonough, 954 So. 2d 712, 2007 WL 1173773 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

954 So.2d 712 (2007)

Kevin D. D'HAITI, Appellant,
v.
James R. McDONOUGH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 1D05-4992.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 23, 2007.

Kevin D. D'Haiti, pro se, Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Kathleen Von Hoene, General Counsel, and Daniel R. Burke, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Kevin D. D'Haiti seeks review of the circuit court's order dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus on the basis that Mr. D'Haiti failed to prepay a portion of the circuit court's filing fee as previously ordered in the circuit court's "Clerk's Certificate of Indigence." That order determined Mr. D'Haiti to be indigent but able to prepay $11.00 of the $280.00 total filing fee imposed, and required that the Florida Department of Corrections place a lien on his inmate account for the remainder.

As the Department concedes, the action filed in the circuit court was a collateral criminal action as defined in Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361, 367 (Fla.2003). Accordingly, we reverse the order dismissing Mr. D'Haiti's mandamus petition; vacate the indigency order insofar as it requires partial prepayment and placement of a lien on his inmate trust account for the remainder, see Cason v. Crosby, 892 So.2d 536, 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); remand for further proceedings on his mandamus petition; and direct that the circuit court enter an order on remand requiring reimbursement to Mr. D'Haiti of those funds withdrawn from his account pursuant to the lien. See, e.g., Marquez v. McDonough, 945 So.2d 652, 653 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Reversed and remanded.

BROWNING, C.J., BENTON, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cason v. Crosby
892 So. 2d 536 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Schmidt v. Crusoe
878 So. 2d 361 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Marquez v. McDonough
945 So. 2d 652 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Bivens v. State
954 So. 2d 712 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
954 So. 2d 712, 2007 WL 1173773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dhaiti-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2007.