D.H. v. State
521 So. 2d 388, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 691, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1007, 1988 WL 21030
Opinion
A careful review of the record fails to demonstrate that the state proved the identity of the appellant as the perpetrator of the crime; we therefore reverse the adjudication and order D.H. discharged. See Z.P. v. State, 440 So.2d 601 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); W.J. v. State, 406 So.2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Ponsell v. State, 393 So.2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D.H. v. State, 521 So. 2d 388, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 691, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1007, 1988 WL 21030 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
521 So. 2d 388 (D.H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ponsell v. State
393 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
W.J. v. State
406 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Z.P. v. State
440 So. 2d 601 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)