D.H. v. State
521 So. 2d 388, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 691, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1007, 1988 WL 21030
This text of 521 So. 2d 388 (D.H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.H. v. State, 521 So. 2d 388, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 691, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1007, 1988 WL 21030 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
A careful review of the record fails to demonstrate that the state proved the identity of the appellant as the perpetrator of the crime; we therefore reverse the adjudication and order D.H. discharged. See Z.P. v. State, 440 So.2d 601 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); W.J. v. State, 406 So.2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Ponsell v. State, 393 So.2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ponsell v. State
393 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
W.J. v. State
406 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Z.P. v. State
440 So. 2d 601 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
521 So. 2d 388, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 691, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1007, 1988 WL 21030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dh-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.