D.G. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.G. v. State

693 So. 2d 711, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5640, 1997 WL 269163

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 21, 1997

DocketNo. 96-2341

StatusPublished

This text of 693 So. 2d 711 (D.G. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D.G. v. State, 693 So. 2d 711, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5640, 1997 WL 269163 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, but remand this matter to the trial court for correction of a clerical error and clarification of the written sentence. The defendant was convicted by trial, but the disposition order indicates that he was convicted by plea. In addition, the order does not clearly indicate the defendant’s sentence.

JUDGMENT and SENTENCE AFFIRMED; CAUSE REMANDED.

DELL, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, but remand this matter to the trial court for correction of a clerical error and clarification of the written sentence. The defendant was convicted by trial, but the disposition order indicates that he was convicted by plea. In addition, the order does not clearly indicate the defendant’s sentence.

JUDGMENT and SENTENCE AFFIRMED; CAUSE REMANDED.

DELL, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

693 So. 2d 711, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5640, 1997 WL 269163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dg-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.